The Inquiry Commission on the State of Emergency measures reviews and concludes the applications concerning the measures adopted under the state of emergency decree-laws, such as the dismissal of public officials, cancellation of scholarship, annulment of the ranks of retired personnel and the closure of some institutions. The Commission employs a total of 240 personnel, 75 of whom are rapporteurs (judges, experts, inspectors).

Application Process and Classification

  • The Commission has set up a data processing infrastructure in order to receive, archive and examine applications in an electronic environment, and the information on the applications acquired from more than 20 institutions and organizations have been recorded in this system.
  • Classification, registration and archiving of a total of 495,010 files, including personnel files transferred from their institutions, court files and former applications, have been completed.

Decisions of the Commission

  • By the decree-laws issued within the scope of the state of emergency, a total of 131,922 measures were taken, 125,678 of which were dismissal from public service.
  • The number of applications submitted to the Commission is 126,758 as of 28 October 2021. Regarding the number of the decisions delivered by the Commission (118,415), the number of pending applications is 8,343.
  • The Commission started its decision-making process on 22 December 2017 and as of 28 October 2021, the Commission has delivered 118,415 (15,050 accepted, 103,365 rejected) decisions. 61 of the acceptance decisions are related to the opening of organizations that were shut down (associations, foundations, television channels).
  • Accordingly, 93 percent of the applications have been decided since the date of the beginning of the Commission’s decision-making process.
  • The decisions of the Commission are circulated to the institutions where the persons lastly took office for the purpose of being notified. The procedure of appointment of those whose applications were accepted is carried out by the institution where they lastly took office and the Council of Higher Education where relevant.
  • An annulment action may be brought before the Ankara Administrative Courts determined by the Council of Judges and Prosecutors against the decisions of the Commission and the institution or organization where the relevant person lastly took office, within a period of sixty days as from the date of notification of the decision.


State of Applications

  • The applicants are able to acquire information on the stage of the applications filed with the Commission and the outcome of the decision (“acceptance” or “rejection”) through the app of “The Inquiry Commission on State of Emergency Measures- Application Follow-up System” on the Commission’s website.


Activity Report

  • The activity report of the Commission was published on the Commission’s website and can be accessed at

As an effective remedy, the Commission delivers individualized and reasoned decisions as a result of speedy and extensive examination. The Commission conducts the examination in terms of membership, affiliation, connection or contact with terrorist organizations or structures/entities or groups established by the National Security Council as engaging in activities against the national security of the State. In addition, decisions taken by the judicial authorities are monitored through the UYAP system.

Announced to the public.

The Inquiry Commission on the State of Emergency Measures Activity Report (2020) published

The work of the Inquiry Commission on the State of Emergency Measures since its inauguration, all activities from the data analysis system created to the evaluation criteria, from the detection of illegal activities of FETÖ to decision samples has been reported in both Turkish and English.

In the report, which gives information about the establishment of the commission, it is stated that 126 thousand 630 applications have been submitted to the Commission so far. In the report, which pointed out that the Commission has concluded approximately 89 percent of the applications within three years, it was reminded that the processes related to the applications can be followed in the application tracking system on the Commission's website.

The Details of the Decisions

  • By the decree-laws issued within the scope of the state of emergency, a total of 131,922 measures were taken, 125,678 of which were dismissal from public service.
  • The Commission has delivered 112,310 (13,170 accepted, 99,140 rejected) decisions. 61 of the acceptance decisions are related to the opening of organizations that were shut down (associations, foundations, and television channels).
  • The remaining 14,320 files are expected to be finalized within this year.

The report also provides information on how the application is being examined and what is being done in the decision process. In the "Application Examination System" created by the Commission, it was stated that the information obtained from more than 20 institutions was included and interrogations were made under 95 separate headings. Images of this system were also shared.

In the section titled " Application Assessment Method of the Commission on the State of Emergency” in the annual report, it is explained that in every case examined by the Commission the reasons for dismissal and the data gathered have been assessed with due diligence having regard to the submissions in the petitions of application and the Commission's approach for the assessments focuses mainly to identify whether individuals have acted in line with the order and instructions of the terrorist organization.

In the report, it is cited that the Commission examines every case individually and renders a reasoned decision. In that connection, applications of 1,116 spouses whose spouses’ applications were rejected due to their connection with the organization in line with the examinations carried out by the Commission, have been accepted.

In addition, it is stated that the Commission keeps track of the decisions of the judicial authorities through the UYAP (“National Judiciary Informatics System”) and regardless of the investigations and prosecutions carried out by the judicial authorities within the scope of the membership of the terrorist organization, the Commission issued decisions as a result of an administrative review and evaluation whether there was association or connection.

In the report, it is pointed out that efforts have been made to return the rights of the individuals victimised by the organisation FETÖ and individuals who were deceived by the organisation through shared ADSL lines and usage of Bylock on the GSM phone numbers which have been given to relatives. It is explained in the Report that the applications are concluded with reasoned decisions and acceptance and rejection decision samples are also included.

In the report, the criteria used by the Commission in examining applications are listed as follows:

“Information and findings in the judicial investigations and prosecutions, information on the usership of intra-organisational communication software used by the FETÖ/PDY organisation such as Bylock, eagle etc., information on whether applicants have opened a new account and deposited money directly or via taking a loan from another bank at Bank Asya with a view to provide support upon the instruction of the leader of the FETÖ/PDY, information on whether applicants have become members or leaders of the unions, associations, foundations and federations which have been shut down due to their membership, association and connection with the terrorist organisation FETÖ/PDY, information on whether certain personnel of the security forces have also been subject to proceedings in the “active coup cases” (i.e. the cases with the charge of actively participating in the coup attempt), information about the security personnel named in the lists of Martial Law Appointment List, Regional Commanders List and the Council List during the coup attempt process, information on Payphone/Sequential calls within the scope of organisational contact between the FETÖ’s secret imams and security personnel, information about the personnel of the Turkish national police, who were found to have been “coded” (i.e. profiled) with respect to their allegiance to the FETÖ organisation, information about the individuals who were found to have played a secret role within the FETÖ organisation with a view to ensuring the organisational commitment and loyalty of the security forces personnel, information about the investigations concerning the organisational infractions committed in the Public Personnel Selection Exam (KPSS), Entry Exams for Public Institutions and Police Sub-inspector examination, and so on, information about individuals who used GSM phone numbers for organisational purposes in the process of placing members of the FETÖ organisation inside public institutions, information about individuals against whom judicial investigations have been carried out concerning incidents of intra-organisational arranged marriages and placement in jobs, information as regards the records of employment at the associated establishments, information on financial support, suspicious money transfers to the sponsor establishments and other financial information, information on connection with the media outlets associated with the organisation and information collected from examinations, inquiries and administrative investigations carried out by institutions .

In addition, it is reported that, in cases where it is detected that the file has been prepared on the basis of superior chief’s opinion; this opinion, subscription payment to the gazette associated with the organisation or membership to the closed institutions associated with the organisation only have not been considered as a reason for dismissal of application.

Secret Structure

In the report, which also describes the secret structuring of FETÖ, it was stated that the secret service stands for secret activities carried out on behalf of the organisation through infiltrating the most critical and operational organs of the State.

In the report, it is noted that the judiciary, national police, civil services, the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK), the National Intelligence Organisation (MİT), and some special institutions are accepted as secret places by FETÖ. It is shown that members of the organisation in the institutions such as national police, TSK and MİT generally operate under civil imams who are not connected to the relevant institution and these service units have a cell structuring. In the report, it is pointed out that in secret services, specially chosen members of the organisation who will perform the instructions from Fetullah Gülen or the senior executives of the organisation without questioning rationality, religion, legislation and ethics, and who show absolute obedience and submission, are assigned. Instances for secret structuring were also included in the report.

In the "Irregularities by the FETÖ/PDY organisation in Public Institutions" section of the annual report, it is explained that the organisation had obtained the exam questions of the entry exams for public institutions illegally and had given them to the members of the organisation in houses called “Cram House for Public Personnel Selection Exam (KPSS)/Institutional Exams”, located mostly in Ankara and owned by the FETÖ/PDY Terrorist Organisation.

The final section of the report contained information on visits to the Commission.

It is stated that the report is intended to "convey comprehensive information about the work of the commission to the public" and that the study will be shared with the representatives of the legislative, executive, judicial and media, as well as the members of international organizations.

The entire OHAL Commission's annual report can be accessed on